During the 57th ASEAN Foreign Ministers Meeting and related meeting which took place in Laos, regional concerns about boundary disputes between neighboring countries and violence in Myanmar were brought up. The event gained added interest when External Affairs Minister (EAM) S. Jaishakar and Wang Yi, his counterpart from China met on the sidelines of the regional meet.
According to a statement from the ministry of external affairs, EAM Jaishankar and Wang Yi, his Chinese counterpart, met on the sidelines of the ASEAN event in Vientiane, Laos, to assess the ties between India and China and bilateral dialogue the conversation that was started in Astana earlier this month.
The fact that the two met twice in less than a month highlights how crucial it is for Beijing and New Delhi to find an early solution to the LAC dispute.
Shortly after Jaishankar landed in Vientiane, Laos, for a series of ASEAN-related meetings, the meeting took place. During the visit, this is one of the first bilateral meetings that has taken place. The main focus of the talks between the two was finding a quick and early solution to the outstanding issues along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in order to stabilize the situation and mend the two nations’ bilateral relations.
Jaishankar stated that “it is crucial for the future of Asia and the multipolar world that the two countries are able to guarantee their stability and progress” in his opening remarks before their meeting.
“There is potential for peace and tranquility along the borders, and any sort of normalcy in bilateral relations requires respect for the Line of Agreement,” he said.
They came to the conclusion during their conversation that they needed to move quickly and purposefully to resolve the LAC, which has strained their bilateral ties since 2020.
“Peace and tranquility on the borders is possible, and respect for LAC is essential for any kind of normalcy in bilateral relations. It is necessary for both sides to abide by protocols and relevant bilateral agreements and understanding reached between them in the past,” the MEA said in a statement.
In addition, Jaishankar emphasized the significance of the three mutuals: mutual respect, mutual interests, and mutual sensitivity, underlining Beijing’s behavior that Beijing should expect in the near future if normalcy is to be expected in New Delhi.
Wang Yi, his counterpart, emphasized that strengthening India-China relations benefits not just the two countries but also other countries. An “early meeting” of the Working Mechanism on Consultation and Coordination on India-China Border Affairs (WMCC), which will include officials from the External Affairs Ministry as well as border and military officials, has been agreed to by both parties, according to the External Affairs Ministry. The purpose of this summit is to advance talks on border issues between China and India.
The two sides had previously succeeded in pulling out of a number of fighting zones between 2020 and 2022, but further negotiations in the WMCC and among border commanders have not produced any appreciable advancements. The removal of the Chinese troops from its positions in the Demchok and Depsang areas is the biggest unsolved issue.
The two parties “had an in-depth exchange of views on how to achieve complete disengagement and resolve remaining issues along the Line of Actual Control (LCA)” at the 29th meeting of the WMCC grouping, which was held in Beijing in March 2024.
“In the interim, both parties decided to keep in regular communication via diplomatic and military channels.”
Jaishankar voiced his hope that the meeting on Thursday would allow them to give authorities more powerful directives to properly complete the disengagement process, which has harmed India-China relations.
Furthermore, he emphasized how crucial it is for both sides to respect the terms of the Line of Actual Control (LAC) and earlier agreements. This demonstrates the importance of the boundary management agreements reached in the 1990s, which are still relevant for India to resolve the current military impasse.
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) violated the LAC in April 2020, leading to deadly fighting in Galwan and the first casualties on the disputed border between India and China in forty years. This led to the current impasse.
The talks took place at a time when the Indian government is considering lifting some restrictions on Chinese businesses and openly encouraging more foreign direct investment from China, as indicated by the Economic Survey that was released before this week’s budget.
The world’s two most populous nations, China and India, need to work out their border disputes in order to maintain geopolitical balance, economic growth, and regional stability. Periodically, the ongoing border tensions, especially along the Line of Actual Control (LAC), have turned violent, straining diplomatic ties and leading to military standoffs.
It is important to settle these conflicts for a number of reasons. First, unresolved border conflicts have frequently resulted in military standoffs and skirmishes, endangering regional stability and needlessly taking lives. Examples of these disputes are those in Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh.
Second, prolonged hostilities waste large sums of money on military spending that might be better used for social welfare and development initiatives that would help their sizable populations.
Also Read: How India can subdue Pakistan and eliminate Kashmir jihad
Furthermore, stronger bilateral ties would boost commerce, investment, and collaboration in international fora, resulting in prosperity in the region.
Additionally, settling these disagreements would make it easier for China and India to work together on international problems like terrorism and climate change. A more stable geopolitical climate in Asia would be facilitated by peaceful borders, strengthening regional cooperation and alliances.
In summary, border dispute resolution is both a strategic need and an essential first step in guaranteeing long-term peace, stability, and prosperity for both countries and the area as a whole.
